Our Technology
Our Technology
Overview
Overview
Complex matters generate more material than any team can read, and rarely allow the time to read it. Document sets run to hundreds of thousands of pages. Decisions have to be made in days, sometimes hours, on evidence that hasn't been fully understood. The decisive fact is rarely hidden — it's buried among everything else, and usually needed before anyone has found it.
CIDAH was built to close that gap. Built through the firm's own technology company, alongside the practice it serves, it gives a focused senior team the operational reach of a firm many times its size — without adding a layer between the client and the partner handling the matter.
The pages that follow set out how: the platform itself, how we govern its use, the principles behind it, and the safeguards around client data.
- Built in-house, by the lawyers who use it
- Senior-team reach at scale
- No added layer between client and partner
NE’EMAN KEYNAN · QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
Technology, evidence and responsibility
What we do, how we work and what to clarify before a mandate.
Technology, evidence & human judgment
What is the CIDAH legal platform?
CIDAH is the proprietary intelligence system developed alongside the firm through its own technology company.
The legal platform processes large volumes of evidence and surfaces patterns, connections and inconsistencies. It is described as purpose-built for the way the firm’s lawyers work, rather than a general tool renamed for legal use.
What material does the legal platform work with?
The platform is described as supporting large-scale ingestion of documents and communications for legal work.
Its stated functions include mapping relationships across a file and testing the internal consistency of a case or position. The material that can be used in a particular matter depends on the scope and handling arrangements agreed for that matter.
What kinds of findings can the platform help surface?
The firm describes identifying candidate facts, connections between documents, inconsistencies and issues in a timeline.
The platform is intended to help the lawyer assess what the file means and where a position may be exposed. A machine-generated candidate finding is not treated here as a verified legal conclusion; it must be weighed and reviewed by the lawyer.
How can technology accelerate work on a large case file?
Technology can support processing, search, relationship mapping and consistency checks across a large file without making every task depend on sequential manual reading.
Ne’eman Keynan uses the CIDAH platform to support its lawyers in this work. Faster processing does not remove the need to verify material findings or resolve gaps; the website makes no quantified comparison or universal turnaround promise.
What does human sign-off involve?
The firm describes human sign-off as a substantive review of whether a conclusion is legally sound, complete and appropriate for the matter and client.
It is not described as a final proofread. Conclusions produced with platform assistance are reviewed by the lawyer responsible before use or delivery; the firm stands behind legal judgment rather than an unreviewed tool output.
Does the platform replace the lawyer?
No. Ne’eman Keynan’s model uses technology to support the lawyer’s work while keeping judgment and responsibility with the attorney.
The stated purpose is to improve rigor, consistency and responsiveness in complex matters. The platform can surface material and candidate findings; the lawyer assesses their significance and takes responsibility for the conclusion.
No matching answers. Try a shorter phrase.
General information about the firm and its services, not advice on a specific matter, an agreement to act or a guarantee of outcome.
Discuss your matter